The Canadian Sea Ice and Snow Evolution (CanSISE) Network is a newly funded 5-year collaborative partnership between researchers from eight Canadian universities (Toronto, York, McGill, Victoria, Guelph, Waterloo, UBC, UNBC) and three partner organizations (the Climate Research Division of Environment Canada, the Canadian Ice Service, and the Pacific Climate Impacts Consortium). The CanSISE Network seeks to advance seasonal to multidecadal prediction of Arctic sea ice and snow in Canada’s sub-Arctic, alpine, and seasonally snow covered regions. It will also quantify and exploit, for prediction purposes, the role that Northern Hemisphere snow and sea ice processes play in climate variability and change. CanSISE is funded under the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada's (NSERC) Climate Change and Atmospheric Research (CCAR) program.
June 28, 2016
Congratulations to CanSISE Collaborator Michael Sigmond and CanSISE Investigator John Fyfe and for their publication in Nature Climate Change titled "Tropical Pacific impacts on cooling North American winters".
View only - http://rdcu.be/i1TZ
We are pleased to announce that the CanSISE Deliverable 1 report has been finalized, and is now available for download here:
Could you briefly describe your position within the CanSISE Network?
I am a PhD student at the University of British Columbia working under William Hsieh, a funded CanSISE investigator.
What is your primary research goal?
The primary goal of my research is to develop high-resolution maps of snow across British Columbia (BC). The value I'm interested in is snow water equivalent (SWE), which tells you how much water is in the snowpack. Knowing the amount of snow water on a regional scale (100s of km) helps hydrologists and water resource managers to predict how much water will be released during the melt season as river runoff. This is especially important in regions like BC, which depends on this water to make it through the drier summer months.
Can you tell us a bit more about regional snow estimation?
There are different types of models or "gridded products" that attempt to represent snow, among other physical properties, on large scales. These include land data assimilation systems, reanalyses, observation-based products and others that use blended techniques. While such products work well in flat, open areas that don't see much snow, the conditions in many parts of BC are quite different -- mountainous, heavily forested, and receiving many metres of snow. These conditions make it difficult to make good estimates of snow across the entire region.
Please explain how you investigate regional snow distribution?
I use machine learning methods such as artificial neural networks (ANNs) to attempt to estimate the snowpack. The neural networks build statistical representations of the regional snowpack using many inputs. Manual snow survey stations provide on the ground measurements of the actual snowpack, whereas the gridded products show estimates on a larger scale. Additional information like elevation, latitude, longitude and time of year (known as "predictors") are also fed into the model, which can then estimate snow at other locations and times. To check how well the model is doing, I use "cross-validation", a technique in which I leave out a fraction of survey stations spread throughout the province to use later as test stations and build the model using only data from the non-test stations. The model performance is then measured at the test stations. The process is repeated so all survey stations are utilized as test stations.
Tell us about something you've discovered.
The ANN model that uses only off-the-shelf gridded products plus the additional information as inputs (ANNG in Figure 1) has a lower mean station root-mean-square error (RMSE) and therefore does a better job of estimating the snowpack than the individual products themselves. The ANN using the gridded products even does better than the high-resolution Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) hydrologic model that has been run by the Pacific Climate Impact Consortium for 4 major BC watersheds (see https://pacificclimate.org/data/gridded-hydrologic-model-output for details on the VIC runs).
Figure 1: Mean Station RMSE for 3 evaluated gridded products plus VIC. Shown from left to right are the 3 best performing gridded SWE products (GLDAS2, ERALand and MERRA); mean, multiple linear regression (MLR) and ANN of those gridded products; SnowMelt model; MLR and ANN using gridded products and the SnowMelt model; and VIC. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.
I also setup a snow model (EcoHydRology SnowMelt) driven by a high-resolution temperature and precipitation data set (bias-corrected ANUSPLIN). The snow output from this model used as an extra predictor in the ANN model further enhances its performance (ANNGS), such that the new ANN performs significantly better than VIC.
What implications does this have for future efforts to estimate the amount of snow?
Machine learning methods are a tool to bring together many sources of information and most likely better estimate snow water equivalent than individual methods or products. In areas where it is very difficult to estimate snow, such as BC, such methods could become an important part of water planning and decision making.
How does your research fit into the broader scope of the CanSISE Network?
My project is part of research area A, focused on improving seasonal to multidecadal snow and sea ice prediction. This model will be used to downscale and bias correct a prediction system (CanSIPS) that will lead to improved snow water forecasts.
What are your next steps?
Additional data sources will be incorporated into the model to try to gain further improvements. Satellite microwave data, used to estimate snow water equivalent with some success in less complex environments, along with visible wavelength data that show forests and snow lines will be tested.
On October 30th, 2015 more than twenty members of CanSISE gathered at the University of Victoria for a regional meeting hosted by our colleagues at PCIC. The day was filled with presentations from CanSISE investigators and HQP, as well as a talk by our invited guest Shawn Marshall from the University of Calgary (agenda below).
Many of the presentations will be made available on our Events and Meetings page. Our next regional meeting will in Toronto in January 2016, hosted by our colleagues at Environment Canada. Plans the January 2016 meeting and the agenda will be developed over the next month.
To a unique degree, CanSISE will bring together University and government researchers with climate modelling and observational expertise. For
more information please visit our Organization page.
CanSISE activities are organized into three theme areas, including a) seasonal to multi-decadal snow and sea-ice prediction and projection, b) attributing change in snow and sea-ice, and understanding its impacts, and c) improving our understanding of snow and sea ice processes and climate interactions. More information on CanSISE activities can be found on Our Research page.
CanSISE is currently in its second year and hiring and placements in its research projects are ongoing.